Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Keith Dougherty, Appellant v. McKee, Chief, Administator, et al., Appellees
ORDER
Upon consideration of the motion for summary reversal, the supplements thereto, the oppositions, and the reply; the motions for summary affirmance, and the oppositions thereto; and the notices and letters filed by appellant, which include requests for transfer and for preliminary injunctive relief, it is
ORDERED that the requests for transfer and injunctive relief be denied. Appellant has not demonstrated any basis for the relief requested. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary reversal be denied and the motions for summary affirmance be granted. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to warrant summary affirmance. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam). The district court properly determined that appellant's claims for damages against the government and judicial officers were barred by sovereign immunity and the Eleventh Amendment, see, e.g., FDIC v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471, 475 (1994); that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over defendants Snyder, Stevens & Lee, P.C., et al., Crane v. New York Zoological Soc'y, 894 F.2d 454, 456 (D.C. Cir. 1990); and that appellant failed to state a claim against the remaining defendants, see Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007). Any claims for injunctive relief were properly dismissed as well for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Finally, the court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for reconsideration on the ground that he had offered no new facts nor pointed to a change in circumstances, including a change in the law, clear error, or injustice, to warrant reconsideration. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e); Firestone v. Firestone, 76 F.3d 1205, 1208 (D.C. Cir. 1996).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
Per Curiam
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 16-5052
Decided: February 02, 2017
Court: United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)