IN RE: D. R. SELLERS (1969)

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

IN RE: D. R. SELLERS, Bankrupt, Appellant, v. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, Appellee.

No. 26420.

Decided: February 25, 1969

Before WISDOM, COLEMAN, and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

O. Joseph Damiani, Houston, Tex., for appellant. Anthony J. P. Farris, Morton L. Susman, U.S. Attys., James R. Gough, Joel P. Kay, Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, Tex., for appellee.

In this case, the Referee in Bankruptcy denied a discharge to the appellant, D. R. Sellers. Upon review the District Court affirmed, In re Sellers, 295 F.Supp. 1354. Upon consideration of the appeal, we find no error in the action taken by the District Court, and we affirm on the basis of its published opinion.¹

Affirmed.

FOOTNOTES

1. Having studied the briefs and records, we have determined that this appeal is appropriate for summary disposition without argument. Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit the Clerk of this Court has been directed to put this case on the summary calendar and notify the parties in writing. See for example Gamez v. Beto, January 30, 1969 (406 F.2d 1000).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network