Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jason WOLFORD; Alison Wolford; Atom Kasprzycki; Hawaii Firearms Coalition, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Anne E. LOPEZ, in her official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Hawaii, Defendant-Appellant.
OPINION
In 2023, the Hawaii legislature enacted Act 52, which prohibits the carry of firearms in many sensitive places. The law also prohibits the carry of firearms onto private property unless the owner allows it. Several Plaintiffs brought this action, asserting that the law violates the Second Amendment, and they sought a preliminary injunction as to some aspects of the law. The district court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiffs' request. Defendant Anne E. Lopez, Attorney General of the State of Hawaii, timely appealed.
We affirmed the preliminary injunction in several respects and reversed the preliminary injunction in several respects. Wolford v. Lopez, 116 F.4th 959 (9th Cir. 2024). Relevant here, we held that Plaintiffs had not shown a likelihood of success in challenging the law's default rule as to private property, which is codified in Hawaii Revised Statutes section 134-9.5. Id. at 992–96. The Supreme Court granted certiorari limited to the question concerning the private-property rule. Wolford v. Lopez, ––– U.S. ––––, 146 S. Ct. 79, 222 L.Ed.2d 1241 (2025). Addressing that question only, the Court reversed our determination and remanded for further proceedings. Wolford v. Lopez, 609 U.S. –––, 146 S. Ct. 2032, ––– L.Ed.2d –––– (2026). Accordingly, we now affirm the district court's injunction as to Hawaii Revised Statutes section 134-9.5. Our analysis as to all other aspects of Hawaii's law is unaffected.
For the reasons stated here and in our earlier decision, we affirm the injunction insofar as it enjoins Hawaii Revised Statutes sections 134-9.5 and 134-9.1(a)(12) and “the portions of [Hawaii Revised Statutes section 134-9.1](a)(1) that prohibit carrying firearms in parking areas owned, leased, or used by the State or a county which share the parking area with non-governmental entities, are not reserved for State or county employees, or do not exclusively serve the State or county building.” We reverse the injunction insofar as it enjoins Hawaii Revised Statutes sections 134-9.1(a)(4) and 134-9.1(a)(9).
AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART. REMANDED.
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No.23-16164
Decided: August 10, 2026
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Make It a Preferred Google Search Source
Add to GoogleGet help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)