ELLIS v. EISENMAN FAMILY TRUST (2021)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Oudree S. ELLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EISENMAN FAMILY TRUST; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 20-55064

Decided: July 28, 2021

Before: SCHROEDER, SILVERMAN, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Oudree S. Ellis, Sunset Beach, CA, Pro Se. Larry Rothman, Esquire, Attorney, Larry Rothman & Associates, Anaheim Hills, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

MEMORANDUM **

Oudree S. Ellis appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing her action alleging race discrimination under the Fair Housing Act and other federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

The district court did not err by concluding that the stipulation entered between the parties in the unlawful detainer action was a settlement of the parties’ dispute and preclusive of this action.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Ellis's motion to alter or amend the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) because Ellis failed to demonstrate any basis for relief. See Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262-63 (9th Cir. 1993) (setting forth standard of review and grounds for relief under Rule 59(e)).

AFFIRMED.

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law