Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Francisco MOREIRA, aka Francisco Davila Moreira, aka Jose Martinez, aka Jose A. Martinez, aka Jose Martinez Avalos, aka Francisco Moreira Davila, aka Fransncisco Moreira Davila, aka Frasncisco Moreira Davila, aka Francisco Moreira Pavila, Petitioner, v. Robert M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM **
Francisco Moreira, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's (“IJ”) decision finding him removable and concluding that he was not eligible for any form of relief from removal, including cancellation of removal.
Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.
The only claim that Moreira makes is that he was denied due process because the IJ did not advise him of his eligibility for pre-conclusion voluntary departure. We lack jurisdiction to consider that claim because it was not raised before the agency. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677–78 (9th Cir. 2004) (holding that the court lacks jurisdiction to review claims not presented to the agency). Even construing Moreira's pro se brief to the BIA liberally, it was insufficient to alert the BIA that voluntary departure was at issue. See Alvarado v. Holder, 759 F.3d 1121, 1128 (9th Cir. 2014) (concluding that the court lacked jurisdiction over an unexhausted claim even after liberally construing the petitioner's pro se argument); Tall v. Mukasey, 517 F.3d 1115, 1120 (9th Cir. 2008) (“Although [Petitioner] raised a procedural due process claim in his appeal to the BIA ․ [he] did not give the BIA an opportunity to consider and remedy the particular procedural errors he raises now.”).
On May 12, 2015, the court granted a stay of removal. The stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the mandate.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 14-73997
Decided: February 19, 2021
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)