Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Wendy GISH; Patrick Scales; James Dean Moffatt; Brenda Wood, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gavin NEWSOM, in his official capacity as the Governor of California; Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of California; Erin Gustafson, in her official capacity as the San Bernardino County Acting Public Health Officer; John McMahon, in his official capacity as the San Bernardino County Sheriff; Robert Lovinggood, in his official capacity as a San Bernardino County Supervisor; Janice Rutherford, in her official capacity as a San Bernardino County Supervisor; Dawn Rowe, in her official capacity as a San Bernardino County Supervisor; Curt Hagman, in his official capacity as a San Bernardino County Supervisor; Josie Gonzales, in his official capacity as a San Bernardino County Supervisor; Cameron Kaiser, in his official capacity as the Riverside County Public Health Officer; George Johnson, in his official capacity as the Riverside County Executive Officer and Director of Emergency Services; Chad Bianco, in his official capacity as a Riverside County Sheriff; Kevin Jeffries, in his official capacity as a Riverside County Supervisor; Karen Spiegel, in her official capacity as a Riverside County Supervisor; Chuck Washington, in his official capacity as a Riverside County Supervisor; V. Manuel Perez, in his official capacity as a Riverside County Supervisor; Jeff Hewitt, in his official capacity as a Riverside County Supervisor; County of San Bernardino, Defendants-Appellees.
ORDER
Pursuant to the order of the United States Supreme Court dated February 8, 2021, the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. Newsom, 592 U.S. ––––, 141 S.Ct. 716, ––– L.Ed.2d –––– (2021).
The motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal in Case No. 20-55445 pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) is granted. The four motions to take judicial notice in Case No. 20-55445 and the two motions to take judicial notice in Case No. 20-56324 are dismissed as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Nos. 20-55445, 20-56324
Decided: February 17, 2021
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)