PFEISTER v. RSUI INDEMNITY COMPANY (2020)

MEMORANDUM ***

Joanna L. Pfeister appeals pro se from the district court's interlocutory order denying her motion for a preliminary injunction in her diversity action alleging breach of contract and tort claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). We review for an abuse of discretion. Jackson v. City & County of San Francisco, 746 F.3d 953, 958 (9th Cir. 2014). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Pfeister's motion for a preliminary injunction because Pfeister failed to demonstrate that such relief is warranted. See id. (plaintiff seeking preliminary injunction must establish that she is likely to succeed on the merits, likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, the balance of equities tips in her favor, and an injunction is in the public interest).

AFFIRMED.