BORBA CARDOSO v. BARR (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Raul Borges BORBA-CARDOSO, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 17-70742

Decided: August 25, 2020

Before: CALLAHAN and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and BENCIVENGO,** District Judge.

Mario Acosta, Jr., Esquire, Attorney, Law Office of Mario Acosta, Jr., Santa Fe Springs, CA, for Petitioner Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Andrew Nathan O'Malley, Trial Attorney, DOJ - U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

MEMORANDUM ***

Raul Borges Borba-Cardoso petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals order of removal. In a concurrently filed opinion, we hold that perjury under section 118(a) of the California Penal Code is an “offense relating to ․ perjury” and is thus an “aggravated felony.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(S). Borba was convicted under section 118(a), and we therefore lack jurisdiction over his petition for review. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C).

PETITION DISMISSED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network