Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Iris Del Carmen MORALES, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM **
Iris Del Carmen Morales, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge's (“IJ”) decision denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and cancellation of removal. Morales has not challenged the IJ's ruling concerning her claims for asylum or cancellation of removal in the BIA or in our court. She now seeks only withholding of removal and CAT protection.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. See Garcia v. Lynch, 798 F.3d 876, 880 (9th Cir. 2015). We review for substantial evidence the agency's factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency's conclusion that Morales failed to establish that she would be persecuted on account of a protected ground. See Garcia v. Holder, 749 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2014). The record does not compel the conclusion that the BIA erred by determining that the attacks against Morales were opportunistic criminal acts with no nexus to a protected ground. Thus, her withholding of removal claim fails.
Substantial evidence supports the agency's denial of CAT protection because Morales failed to show it is more likely than not she will be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Guatemala. See Zheng v. Holder, 644 F.3d 829, 835-36 (9th Cir. 2011).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 15-70217
Decided: August 26, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)