THURAISSIGIAM v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY DHS CBP CBP ICE (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Vijayakumar THURAISSIGIAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; U.S. Customs and Border Protection; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary of DHS; William P. Barr, Attorney General; Mark A. Morgan, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner of CBP; Thomas Homan; Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; Pete Flores, San Diego Field Director, CBP; Gregory Archambeault, San Diego Field Office Director, ICE; Fred Figueroa, Warden, Otay Mesa Detention Center, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 18-55313

Decided: August 12, 2020

Before: A. Wallace Tashima, M. Margaret McKeown, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In accordance with the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States, “remand[ing] the case with directions that the application for habeas corpus be dismissed,” United States v. Thuraissigiam, ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 1959, 1983, 207 L.Ed.2d 427 (2020), the judgment of the district court, which dismissed with prejudice the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, Thuraissigiam v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 287 F. Supp. 3d 1077, 1083 (S.D. Cal. 2018), is

AFFIRMED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law