Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
J.B.; P.B., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
ORDER **
Appellants filed this action to stop Internal Revenue Service (IRS) audits of their tax returns for the 2011, 2012, and 2013 tax years. During the pendency of this appeal, Appellants and the Government reached a settlement that resolved the 2011, 2012, and 2013 audits. The Government has now moved to dismiss the appeal as moot.
Although Appellants acknowledge that the 2011, 2012, and 2013 audits have been conclusively resolved, they argue that a live controversy remains because they have been harassed by the IRS in the past and could face similar harassment in the future. However, a review of the operative complaint shows that the alleged harassment was in the form of the now-resolved audits. While the complaint alleged that the stress of the audits was detrimental to Appellants’ health, it sought only non-monetary relief related to the audits, not damages to compensate for Appellants’ alleged physical injuries. Finally, although Appellants now argue that they may be subject to future audits (and harassment) by the IRS, this contention is based on nothing more than speculation that is insufficient to give rise to a live controversy. Mayfield v. Dalton, 109 F.3d 1423, 1425 (9th Cir. 1997). We therefore agree with the Government that this appeal is moot.
Accordingly, the Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal as moot (Dkt. # 84) is GRANTED.1 Appellants’ motion for further briefing and oral argument (Dkt. # 101) is DENIED.
Appellants’ motion to partially redact the Government’s March 17, 2020 filing (Dkt. # 110) is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to maintain the Government filing at Dkt. # 100 under seal. An appropriately redacted public version of this filing is available as Exhibit A to Appellants’ motion for partial redaction.
All pending motions to file documents under seal (Dkts. # 45, 46, 93, 94) are GRANTED.
A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court.
DISMISSED.
FOOTNOTES
1. Appellants’ motion for judicial notice of documents submitted in opposition to the motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 95) is GRANTED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 16-17054
Decided: June 11, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)