Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
2233 PARADISE ROAD, LLC, dba Cash Factory USA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John F. KELLY, Secretary of the Homeland Security; Lori L. Scialabba, Director of U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS), Defendants-Appellees.
MEMORANDUM **
Plaintiff 2233 Paradise Road, LLC, timely appeals from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Defendants, the Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“the agency”) and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in this action challenging the agency’s denial of Plaintiff’s petition for an “H-1B visa” on behalf of Songhua Hu for a position of Chief Operating Officer. We dismiss the appeal as moot.
After Plaintiff filed this appeal, Plaintiff informed us that Hu had resigned. The visa petition before us pertains specifically to Hu and cannot be transferred to another individual. Plaintiff asserts only that Hu “may seek to renew the employment relationship in the future.” (Emphasis added.) No live controversy remains, and Plaintiff’s speculation is insufficient to confer jurisdiction. See, e.g., Bain v. Cal. Teachers Ass’n, 891 F.3d 1206, 1214 (9th Cir. 2018) (holding that “[t]he assertion that [a plaintiff] could conceivably return to her old job, without more,” is insufficient to confer jurisdiction).
We dismiss the appeal and remand with instructions for the district court to consider whether to vacate its judgment and dismiss the complaint. U.S. Bancorp Mortg. Co. v. Bonner Mall P’ship, 513 U.S. 18, 24–25, 115 S.Ct. 386, 130 L.Ed.2d 233 (1994); Dilley v. Gunn, 64 F.3d 1365, 1370–71 (9th Cir. 1995).
APPEAL DISMISSED and CASE REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-16341
Decided: May 07, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)