Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, fka The Bank of New York, AS TRUSTEE FOR the CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF the CWMBS INC., CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2006-OA5, MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006; a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nathan Jon LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant, Len C. Perry, Jr.; 3925 Kamehameha Rd Princeville, HI 96722 LLC, a Hawaii limited liability corporation, Defendants.
MEMORANDUM *
Defendant-Appellant Nathan Jon Lewis appeals pro se from the district court's judgment in this diversity action brought by The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of the CWMBS Inc., CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2006-OA5, Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2006 (“BONY”), arising from defendants’ actions which have clouded BONY's title to real property and interfered with its property rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
In his opening brief, Lewis fails to address grounds for summary judgment on BONY's claims and has therefore waived his challenge to the district court's summary judgment order. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009) (matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief are waived).
Lewis argues on appeal that BONY lacked authority to act because it was not registered to do business in Hawaii. However, Lewis waived this argument by failing to raise it in opposition to BONY's summary judgment motion. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (explaining that an appellate court will not consider issues not properly raised before the district court).
AFFIRMED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-15175
Decided: March 13, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)