Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Kathleen KELLOGG-TAXE, Debtor. Richard Taxe, Appellant, v. Carolyn A. Dye, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellee.
MEMORANDUM **
Richard Taxe appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's judgment affirming the bankruptcy court's judgment after a trial in an adversary proceeding filed by the chapter 7 trustee in Kathleen Kellogg-Taxe's bankruptcy case. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the bankruptcy court's conclusions of law and for clear error its findings of fact. Decker v. Tramiel (In re JTS Corp.), 617 F.3d 1102, 1109 (9th Cir. 2010). We affirm.
The bankruptcy court did not clearly err in finding that Taxe owned the shares and assets of Dwarfco Productions, Inc. because the record supports the bankruptcy court's determination that Taxe controlled Dwarfco Productions, Inc.
The bankruptcy court properly concluded the shares and assets of Dwarfco Productions, Inc. are the community property of Taxe and debtor Kathleen Kellogg-Taxe, and thus those assets are property of the bankruptcy estate of Kathleen Kellogg-Taxe. See Brace v. Speier (In re Brace), 908 F.3d 531, 537 (9th Cir. 2018) (“Under California law, there is a general presumption that, absent a statute to the contrary, all property acquired during marriage is community property.”).
We reject as unsupported by the record Taxe's contentions that the bankruptcy court advocated in favor of the bankruptcy trustee and that the bankruptcy court never ordered Taxe to turn over gemstones in his possession.
We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).
AFFIRMED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-60052
Decided: December 18, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)