Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: John Christopher O'CONNOR, an individual, Debtor, Katherine L. O'Connor, an individual and as Trustee of the 2009 Three Children Irrevocable Trust, Appellant, v. John J. Menchaca, Chapter 7 Trustee of John Christopher O'Connor, Appellee.
MEMORANDUM ***
Appellant Katherine L. O'Connor, the wife of a debtor in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding, appeals the decision of the District Court for the Central District of California that granted in part and denied in part the Appellee John J. Menchaca's (the “Trustee”) motion for summary judgment, which sought to avoid certain transfers of real property pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 544, 548 and California Civil Code section 3439.04(a)(1).
1. “Absent exceptional circumstances, we generally will not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal, although we have discretion to do so.” El Paso City v. Am. W. Airlines, Inc. (In re Am. W. Airlines, Inc.), 217 F.3d 1161, 1165 (9th Cir. 2000). On appeal, the Appellant argues for the first time that the Trustee's action is time-barred, because all of the unsecured creditors either knew or should have known about the alleged fraudulent transfers, such that the statute of limitations on each of the unsecured creditor's claims expired prior to the filing of the debtor's bankruptcy petition. In the district court, the Appellant argued only that Wells Fargo's claims were barred. Moreover, the Appellant failed to address any of the exceptions to the general rule that an argument raised for the first time on appeal is waived. See United States v. Carlson, 900 F.2d 1346, 1349 (9th Cir. 1990) (discussing the limited circumstances where we may consider an issue raised for the first time on appeal). Accordingly, the Appellant waived this argument.
2. Similarly, the Appellant raises for the first time on appeal her argument that a creditor must file a proof of claim in order to be considered “a creditor holding an unsecured claim that is allowable” for purposes of 11 U.S.C. § 544(b)(1). Again, the Appellant failed to argue any exceptions to waiver apply. This argument is also waived. See El Paso City, 217 F.3d at 1165.
AFFIRMED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-56196
Decided: December 12, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)