UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ali Mukhtar OSMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Decided: November 25, 2019
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Christina Marie Cabanillas, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USTU-Office of the US Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff - Appellee Ali Mukhtar Osman, Pro Se
Ali Mukhtar Osman appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his jury-trial conviction and sentence of time served plus ten days for unlawful bringing in of a firearm or ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(l), 924(a)(1)(C). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Osman’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Osman the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
Was this helpful?
Response sent, thank you
Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.