UNITED STATES v. HEON CHEOL CHI (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HEON-CHEOL CHI, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-50358

Decided: November 19, 2019

Before: Johnnie B. Rawlinson and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges, and Benjamin H. Settle,* District Judge.

ORDER

The opinion filed on August 30, 2019, is amended as follows:

Slip opinion page 21: DELETE . In its place ADD .

The amended sentence shall read, “In another, Chi sent Kinemetrics an email providing them with confidential information about a competing company.”

With the foregoing amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Rawlinson and Bea have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Settle so recommends.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No additional petitions for rehearing will be permitted.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network