RAY v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Trina RAY, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellant.
Trina Ray; Sasha Walker, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Los Angeles County Department of Public Social Services, Erroneously Sued As County of Los Angeles, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-56581, No. 18-55276

Decided: October 08, 2019

Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw and Mark J. Bennett, Circuit Judges, and Kathleen Cardone,* District Judge.

ORDER

The opinion filed on August 22, 2019 is amended as follows:

On page six of the opinion, in the paragraph beginning “As employers of the homecare providers,” replace with .

With this amendment, the panel votes to deny the appellant’s petition for panel rehearing. [Dkt. 51] Judges Wardlaw and Bennett vote to deny the appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc [DKT No. 51], and Judge Cardone so recommends. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc is therefore DENIED. No further petitions for panel or en banc rehearing shall be permitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law