Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
John R. KIELTY, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee,
Federal Housing Finance Agency, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee, Rancho Lake Condominium Unit-Owners' Association, Inc., Counter-Defendant. John R. Kielty, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, et al., Defendants, Rancho Lake Condominium Unit-Owners' Association, Inc., Counter-Defendant, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant, Federal Housing Finance Agency, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant.
MEMORANDUM **
John R. Kielty appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Nationstar Mortgage LLC, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, and the Federal Housing Finance Agency (collectively, “Appellees”). Reviewing de novo, Berezovsky v. Moniz, 869 F.3d 923, 927 (9th Cir. 2017), we affirm.
The homeowners association’s foreclosure sale, see Nev. Rev. Stat. § 116.3116, did not extinguish Appellees’ deed of trust on the property at issue. When Nationstar’s predecessor mortgage servicer tendered the full amount due the homeowners association, the homeowners association’s superpriority lien on the property was discharged. Bank of Am., N.A. v. SFR Invs. Pool 1, LLC, 427 P.3d 113, 117-19 (Nev. 2018). Nevada law does not require that tender to be recorded. Id. at 119-20. Kielty’s status as a bona fide purchaser of the property, which we need not reach, is irrelevant to the survival of Appellees’ interest in the property. Id. at 121.
The judgment in case No. 17-16913 is AFFIRMED. The cross-appeal in case No. 17-17080 is DISMISSED as moot. The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 17-16913, No. 17-17080
Decided: September 16, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)