ANGON PAZ v. BARR (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Juvencio ANGON-PAZ, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 13-73178

Decided: August 26, 2019

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Christopher James Todd, Law Office of Christopher Todd, Mill Valley, CA, Aaron T. Keesler, Keesler Immigration Law, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner Andrew C. MacLachlan, Senior Litigation Counsel, DOJ - U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Erik R. Quick, Trial Attorney, DOJ - U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

MEMORANDUM *

Juvencio Angon-Paz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order of removal and denial of his motion to suppress. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny the petition.

Even assuming the events at Angon-Paz’s home violated his Fourth Amendment rights and implicate “fruit of the poisonous tree” analysis, the agency did not err in concluding that Angon-Paz’s subsequent admission of his alienage at the post office was voluntary and sufficiently attenuated from the events at his home to purge the taint of any prior illegality. See Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603–04, 95 S.Ct. 2254, 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975).

PETITION DENIED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network