Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Maria Angelita Alfons GOMEZ; et al., Petitioners, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM **
Petitioners Maria Gomez (“Gomez”), her husband, and their two children petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the immigration judge’s order finding Gomez removable. Gomez also appeals the BIA’s decision denying her motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petitions.
In 1994, Gomez sought to adjust status under section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act as the unmarried daughter of a lawful permanent resident. Although Gomez’s marriage certificate lists December 29, 1986, as her date of marriage, she presented a decree from a Philippine court finding that her marriage was invalid from the beginning because various formalities were not followed in the marriage process.
The BIA correctly concluded that it was not required to give effect to the Philippine court order. See Hendrix v. INS, 583 F.2d 1102, 1103 (9th Cir. 1978) (per curiam) (quoting Matter of Wong, 16 I. & N. Dec. 87, 89 (B.I.A. 1977) (“[W]e are not obliged to give retroactive effect to annulments so as to cure a violation of law respecting entry into the United States.”)); Matter of Astorga, 17 I. & N. Dec. 1, 4 (B.I.A. 1979) (“[M]arriages declared void at inception, or annulled, will not relate back to cure a ground of exclusion or deportation at the time of entry where the alien entered the United States in an immigrant status dependent on [her] being unmarried.”).
The BIA also permissibly found that Gomez’s arguments that her marriage was invalid under Philippine law were unpersuasive in light of a visa petition that Gomez filed in 1999 as the married daughter of a United States citizen. In support of that petition, Gomez submitted an affidavit indicating that she married her husband in 1986. Gomez has sought “to decide unilaterally whether ․ her marriage was valid or invalid according to the goal ․ she hopes to achieve.” Hendrix, 583 F.2d at 1104. The BIA was correct in not permitting such a result.
PETITIONS DENIED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Nos. 15-72285, 15-73435
Decided: August 28, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)