WASHINGTON v. ABECASSIS MANAGEMENT (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Anita WASHINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ABECASSIS MANAGEMENT; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18-56514

Decided: July 22, 2019

Before: SCHROEDER, SILVERMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Anita Washington, Pro Se

MEMORANDUM **

Anita Washington appeals pro se from the district court's order denying reconsideration of the district court's order dismissing Washington's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due process and equal protection violations arising out of her eviction from her apartment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Washington's motion for reconsideration because Washington failed to establish any basis for such relief. See id. at 1262-63 (setting forth grounds for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and 60(b)).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network