IN RE: William Robert NORRIE (2019)

MEMORANDUM **

Chapter 7 debtor William Robert Norrie appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his appeal of the bankruptcy court's November 9, 2017 order denying Norrie's motion for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(3). We must consider jurisdiction sua sponte. Greene v. United States (In re Souza), 795 F.2d 855, 857 n.1 (9th Cir. 1986). We vacate and remand.

The district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain this appeal because the notice of appeal was untimely. Norrie's notice of appeal from the bankruptcy court's November 9, 2017 order was filed on December 1, 2017, more than 14 days after entry of the bankruptcy court's order. See 28 U.S.C. § 158(c)(2); Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8002(a)(1) (notice of appeal from bankruptcy court order must be filed within 14 days after filing date of order); Wiersma v. Bank of the West (In re Wiersma), 483 F.3d 933, 938 (9th Cir. 2007) (timely appeal requirement is jurisdictional); Anderson v. Mouradick (In re Mouradick), 13 F.3d 326, 327 (9th Cir. 1994) (“[T]he untimely filing of a notice of appeal deprives the appellate court of jurisdiction to review the bankruptcy court's order.” (citations omitted)). We vacate the judgment of the district court and remand the case for dismissal. See Bender v. Williamsport Area Sch. Dist., 475 U.S. 534, 541, 106 S.Ct. 1326, 89 L.Ed.2d 501 (1986) (when a lower court lacks jurisdiction, appellate court has jurisdiction over the appeal, not of the merits, but merely for the purpose of correcting the error of the lower court in entertaining the suit).

Norrie's request for judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 6) is denied as unnecessary.

VACATED and REMANDED.