UNITED STATES v. DAVIS (2019)

MEMORANDUM **

Rose Marie Davis appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges her guilty-plea convictions and aggregate 34-month sentence for mail theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1708; using or trafficking in an unauthorized access device, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2), (c)(1)(A)(i); and aggravated identity theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Davis’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Davis the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Davis waived the right to appeal her conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.