Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Gregorio TORRES-PEREZ, aka Gregorio Torres, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM **
Gregorio Torres-Perez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision pretermitting his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.
The agency did not err or violate due process in pretermitting Torres-Perez’s application for cancellation of removal based on his conviction for a crime of domestic violence, where the record established that he had been convicted under California Penal Code § 273.5(a). See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1229b(b)(1)(C), 1227(a)(2)(E)(i) (specifying crimes of domestic violence as barring eligibility for cancellation); Carrillo v. Holder, 781 F.3d 1155, 1159-60 (9th Cir. 2015) (holding that § 273.5(a) is categorically a crime of domestic violence); Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (to prevail on a due process challenge, an alien must show error and prejudice).
Torres-Perez’s contentions that the agency violated due process in not allowing him to file a brief regarding eligibility for cancellation of removal, or otherwise consider whether he qualifies for a domestic violence waiver under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(7), fail for lack of prejudice. See Lata, 204 F.3d at 1246.
Torres-Perez’s motion for summary disposition or remand (Docket Entry No. 16) is denied. See Karingithi v. Whitaker, 913 F.3d 1158, 1160-62 (9th Cir. 2019) (initial notice to appear need not include time and date information to vest jurisdiction in the immigration court).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-70102
Decided: July 17, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)