UNITED STATES v. GUIDRY (2019)

MEMORANDUM **

David L. Guidry appeals from the district court's order revoking his conditional discharge and remanding him to the custody of the Attorney General for commitment to a suitable facility under 18 U.S.C. § 4243(g). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Guidry's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We treat Guidry's letter, submitted at Docket Entry No. 16, as a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Any other pending requests are DENIED.

AFFIRMED.