KAMAL v. CANTIL SAKAUYE (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Karim Christian KAMAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tani CANTIL-SAKAUYE, in official capacity; Patricia A. Bigelow, in official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18-55759

Decided: March 19, 2019

Before: LEAVY, BEA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Karim Christian Kamal, Pro Se Sarah Lee Overton, Attorney, Cummings, McClorey, Davis, Acho & Associates, P.C., Riverside, CA, Defendants-Appellees

MEMORANDUM **

Karim Christian Kamal appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for lack of Article III standing. Lopez v. Candaele, 630 F.3d 775, 784-85 (9th Cir. 2010). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Kamal’s action because Kamal failed to allege facts sufficient to show an injury in fact. See id. at 785 (elements of Article III standing).

Kamal’s motion to augment the record and to take judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 9) is denied.

AFFIRMED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law