Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Carlos Geovanni SAMAYOA-DELA ROSA, Petitioner, v. Matthew G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM **
Carlos Geovanni Samayoa-Dela Rosa, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.
Samayoa-Dela Rosa does not challenge the agency’s dispositive conclusion that his asylum application was untimely and that he failed to establish any changed or extraordinary circumstances to excuse the untimely filing. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived). Thus, his asylum claim fails.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination based on inconsistencies between Samayoa-Dela Rosa’s testimony and declaration as to the events of his first interaction with gang members, who caused Samayoa-Dela Rosa’s motorcycle accident, the identity of his grandfather’s murderer, and based on the omission of Samayoa-Dela Rosa’s cousin’s murder from his declaration. See Shrestha, 590 F.3d at 1048 (adverse credibility finding reasonable under the totality of the circumstances). In this case, in the absence of credible testimony, Samayoa-Dela Rosa’s withholding of removal claim fails. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).
Finally, Samayoa-Dela Rosa’s CAT claim fails because it is based on the same testimony the agency found not credible, and Samayoa-Dela Rosa does not point to any other evidence in the record that compels the conclusion that it is more likely than not he would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government of Guatemala. See id. at 1156-57.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 15-73041
Decided: December 03, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)