IN RE: Enrique V. GREENBERG (2018)

MEMORANDUM **

Enrique V. Greenberg appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's (“BAP”) interlocutory orders denying Greenberg's motions for a stay pending appeal and an order denying Greenberg's motion for reconsideration of the BAP's order dismissing his appeal as moot. We dismiss these appeals as moot.

After Greenberg filed the instant appeals, this court dismissed his appeal from a judgment of the BAP affirming the bankruptcy court's order dismissing Greenberg's chapter 11 bankruptcy case as filed in bad faith. See Greenberg v. United States Trustee, No. 17-60078, 2018 WL 1989502 (9th Cir. Feb. 14, 2018). Accordingly, these appeals are rendered moot because this court is unable to grant the requested relief. See Vegas Diamond Props., LLC v. FDIC, 669 F.3d 933, 936 (9th Cir. 2012) (“An appeal is moot if no present controversy exists as to which an appellate court can grant effective relief.”).

DISMISSED.