Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Delgardo Antonio FRAZER, AKA Delgardo A. Frazer, AKA Delgardo Anthonio Frazer, AKA Richard Napier, AKA Ricardo Thomas Smith, AKA Richard Thomas Smith, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM **
Delgardo Antonio Frazer, a native and citizen of Jamaica, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision finding him inadmissible and denying his application to adjust status. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s “reason to believe” determination and we review de novo questions of law. Chavez-Reyes v. Holder, 741 F.3d 1, 3 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that there was “reason to believe” Frazer had knowingly and consciously been involved in drug trafficking, where Frazer testified that he attempted to purchase more than 400 pounds of marijuana for a friend, and he pleaded guilty to solicitation to possess marijuana for sale under Arizona Revised Statute § 13-1002. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(C)(i) (providing that an alien is inadmissible if there is “reason to believe” that he is or has been an “illicit trafficker in any controlled substance”); Chavez-Reyes, 741 F.3d at 2-3 (no conviction is required for the agency to have “reason to believe” an applicant engaged or assisted in illicit trafficking of drugs). Accordingly, the agency properly determined Frazer was statutorily ineligible for adjustment of status.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 16-72861
Decided: August 20, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)