SEQUOIA FORESTKEEPER v. Sierra Forest Products, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee. (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

SEQUOIA FORESTKEEPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eric LA PRICE, in his official capacity as District Ranger for the Western Divide Ranger District of the Sequoia National Forest; et al., Defendants-Appellees, Sierra Forest Products, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-17011

Decided: May 18, 2018

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judge, and ZILLY,* District Judge.

Rachel S. Doughty, Greenfire Law, PC, Berkeley, CA, Rene Voss, Attorney, San Anselmo, CA, Gordon E. Hart, Attorney, Lisa A. Lowry, Paul Hastings LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant Joseph Frueh, USSAC—Office of the US Attorney, Sacramento, CA, Allen M. Brabender, Esquire, Attorney, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees Lawson Emmett Fite, Trial Attorney, American Forest Resource Council, Portland, OR, for Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee

MEMORANDUM **

Plaintiff-Appellant Sierra ForestKeeper appeals the district court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Eric La Price, et al., and Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee Sierra Forest Products. Having carefully considered the record, briefs, and oral arguments, we affirm for the reasons given by the district court in its order dated September 15, 2017.

AFFIRMED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law