Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Pamela BROWN, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHRISTIANA TRUST, A DIVISION OF WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, as Trustee of ARLP Trust 3, Defendant-Appellee.
MEMORANDUM ***
Pamela Brown appeals the district court's dismissal of her action against Christiana Trust, a division of Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB (“the Trust”), for lack of standing. Brown challenged alleged deficiencies in assignments of a deed of trust and the foreclosure sale of real estate, alleging she acquired an interest in the property via a quitclaim deed executed by defaulting borrowers after the foreclosure sale occurred. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
1. A dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law that we review de novo. Hyatt v. Yee, 871 F.3d 1067, 1073 (9th Cir. 2017); see Cetacean Cmty. v. Bush, 386 F.3d 1169, 1174 (9th Cir. 2004) (a plaintiff’s lack of Article III standing is properly attacked through a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction). We find no error in the district court’s finding that Brown had no rights to the property and accordingly lacked standing to challenge the foreclosure and sale. The deed itself and documents properly judicially noticed establish that Brown acquired the property via quitclaim deed from defaulting borrowers after the property had been foreclosed upon and sold in a trustee’s sale. Osswald v. Anderson, 49 Cal.App.4th 812, 57 Cal.Rptr.2d 23, 27 (1996) (a quitclaim deed transfers only the interest the grantor possesses at the time of the conveyance).
2. A district court’s denial of a motion for leave to amend is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. Swanson v. U.S. Forest Serv., 87 F.3d 339, 343 (9th Cir. 1996). Leave to amend is appropriately denied where an amendment would be futile. See Chodos v. West Publ’g Co., 292 F.3d 992, 1003 (9th Cir. 2002) (district court’s discretion to deny leave to amend is particularly broad when it afforded plaintiff one or more opportunities to amend). We find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of leave to amend the complaint.
AFFIRMED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 16-55159
Decided: May 15, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)