JES SOLAR COMPANY LIMITED v. TONG SOO CHUNG (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

JES SOLAR COMPANY LIMITED, a South Korean Corporation; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. TONG SOO CHUNG, Defendant-Appellant.
Jes Solar Company Limited, a South Korean Corporation; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Tong Soo Chung, Defendant, Sungchin Kim, referenced in complaint as S. Chin Kim, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-15504, No. 16-16091

Decided: March 23, 2018

Before: GOULD and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and SANDS,* District Judge.

David Dennis Greene, Esquire, Attorney, Daniel Sung-Jae Ho, The Law Offices of Ho & Greene, PLLC, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiffs-Appellees Jeffrey L. Willis, Esquire, Attorney, Jill H. Perrella, Esquire, Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant

ORDER AMENDING MEMORANDUM

The memorandum disposition in the above-captioned matter filed on February 12, 2018 is amended as follows:

At page 8, lines 7–10, change to .

The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Gould and Watford have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Sands has so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are denied.

No future petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law