Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Francisco Javier HERNANDEZ and Jacqueline Marie Hernandez, Debtors. Francisco Javier Hernandez, AKA Francisco Hernandez; Jacqueline Marie Hernandez, AKA Jacqueline Hernandez, Appellants, v. Martha G. Bronitsky, Chapter 13 Trustee, Appellee.
MEMORANDUM **
Chapter 13 debtors Francisco Javier Hernandez and Jacqueline Marie Hernandez appeal pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's (“BAP”) order dismissing their appeal for failure to prosecute. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(a). We have an independent obligation to determine our jurisdiction over this appeal before proceeding to the merits. Golden v. California Emergency Physicians Med. Grp., 782 F.3d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir. 2015). We dismiss this appeal as moot.
During the pendency of this appeal, we dismissed for lack of jurisdiction debtors’ separate appeal challenging the bankruptcy court's order dismissing their bankruptcy case. Because the bankruptcy court's dismissal order has become final, there is no effective relief we can give to debtors in this appeal and we dismiss this appeal as moot. See Castaic Partners II, LLC v. Daca-Castaic, LLC ( In re Castaic Partners II, LLC ), 823 F.3d 966, 968-69 (9th Cir. 2016) (“The test for mootness of an appeal is whether the appellate court can give the appellant any effective relief in the event that it decides the matter on the merits in his favor” (citation omitted)).
Because we dismiss the appeal as moot, we do not consider debtors’ arguments addressing the underlying merits of the appeal.
DISMISSED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 17-60043
Decided: March 23, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)