UNITED STATES v. PRUETT (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aaron Scott PRUETT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-56858

Decided: January 09, 2018

Before: GRABER, MURGUIA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Lawrence E. Spong, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Helen H. Hong, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, Plaintiff-Appellee Kara Hartzler, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant

ORDER

The separate concurrence to the memorandum disposition filed November 30, 2017, is amended as follows:

On page 2, line 17 of the concurrence, change “In sum, even if we assume” to “Even if we assume”; on page 3, at the end of line 5 of the concurrence, add the citation: “Beckles v. United States, ––– U.S. ––––, 137 S.Ct. 886, 897–98, 197 L.Ed.2d 145 (Ginsburg, J., concurring).”

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it.

Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED.

No further petitions for panel rehearing or for rehearing en banc may be filed.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law