Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
WRITERS GUILD OF AMERICA, WEST, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, Mark Distefano and Guinevere Turner, Plaintiffs, v.
BTG PRODUCTIONS, LLC, Defendant, v. Myriad Pictures, Inc., Third-party-defendant-Appellee.
MEMORANDUM ***
Writers Guild of America, West, Inc. (“Writers Guild”) appeals the district court's order denying its motion to amend a judgment against BTG Productions LLC (“BTG”). Writers Guild sought to add Myriad Pictures (“Myriad”) as a judgment debtor on the grounds that Myriad was the alter ego of BTG. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand to the district court.
1. The dispute involves a collective bargaining agreement. Accordingly, the federal rather than the state test for determining alter ego applies. We remand for the application by the district court of the federal test in United Ass’n of Journeymen & Apprentices Local 343 v. Nor-Cal Plumbing, Inc., 48 F.3d 1465, 1470-71, 1473 (9th Cir. 1994). The record before us indicates that Myriad Pictures is the alter ego of BTG Productions LLC and was a controlling party in the litigation. To the extent that the district court may determine that an evidentiary hearing is required to resolve that question finally, it may conduct one.
2. The district court did not err in finding that Writers Guild of America, West, Inc.’s motion to amend the judgment eight months after the order was timely. See Cigna Property & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Polaris Pictures Corp., 159 F.3d 412, 421 (9th Cir. 1998) (holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion by granting a motion to amend the judgment seven and a half months after the order).
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 16-55332
Decided: January 05, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)