Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
BATTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF THE TE-MOAK TRIBE OF WESTERN SHOSHONE INDIANS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT; JILL C. SILVEY, in official capacity as Bureau of Land Management Elko District Manager, Defendants-Appellees, CARLIN RESOURCES, LLC, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee.
ORDER*
The Battle Mountain Band of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians (“the Band”) moved for a preliminary injunction in the district court to prevent the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) “from issuing any authorizations or notices to proceed” relating to the construction of a power line authorized in a BLM Record of Decision, or “allowing or permitting any ground-disturbing activities related to the Power Line,” including “all earth work or work in preparation of or construction of foundations for power poles or other structures.” The district court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction and the Band appealed. Both the district court and this Court denied the Band's motions for an injunction pending appeal, and the parties agree that construction of the power line has now been completed.
In light of the completion of construction of the power line, we dismiss this appeal from the denial of the preliminary injunction as moot. In Def. of Animals v. U.S. Dep't of Interior, 648 F.3d 1012, 1013-14 (9th Cir. 2011) (per curiam). The underlying action, however, is not moot, and our dismissal is without prejudice to the Band raising in the district court any applications for interlocutory relief arising out of the operation and use of the power line, and is not intended to affect the ability of the district court to order any appropriate relief on final judgment.
This order constitutes the mandate of this Court.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 16-16016
Decided: February 17, 2017
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)