DOMINGO CANSECO RODRIGUEZ AKA v. LORETTA LYNCH (2016)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

DOMINGO CANSECO-RODRIGUEZ, AKA Domingo Conseco Rodriguez, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 15-71170

Decided: December 20, 2016

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM*

Domingo Canseco-Rodriguez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency's continuous physical presence determination. Lopez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 847, 850-51 (9th Cir. 2004). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency's determination that Canseco-Rodriguez failed to provide sufficient testimonial and documentary evidence to establish the requisite ten years of continuous physical presence in the United States. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(A), (d)(1).

We reject Canseco-Rodriguez's contention that the agency failed to analyze all relevant evidence. See Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 990-91 (9th Cir. 2010) (holding the BIA adequately considered evidence and sufficiently announced its decision).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network