Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
TIFFANY M. BURDON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee.
MEMORANDUM*
Tiffany Burdon (Burdon) appeals the district court's decision affirming the determination of an administrative law judge (ALJ) that she was ineligible for Social Security disability benefits. Burdon contends that the ALJ erred in finding that the reports from her physicians and the statements from her lay witnesses were entitled to lesser weight. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
1. The ALJ provided “specific and legitimate reasons that are supported by substantial evidence” when he made his determination that the reports from Burdon's consultative examining physicians were entitled to lesser weight. Bayliss v. Barnhart, 427 F.3d 1211, 1216 (9th Cir. 2005) (citation omitted). Dr. Clifford Tartalia opined that Burdon could only perform simple and repetitive tasks in a low-stress environment, and that it was “unlikely” that she could complete a normal workday, due to her mental health problems. The ALJ properly afforded lesser weight to Dr. Tartalia's report because: (1) it was based on Burdon's subjective statements; and (2) it was inconsistent with other evidence in the record. See Tonapetyan v. Halter, 242 F.3d 1144, 1149 (9th Cir. 2001). Dr. Mark Heilbrunn opined that Burdon could lift only five pounds with each hand on a frequent basis, and that she was limited in her ability to crouch, kneel, or crawl. The ALJ properly afforded lesser weight to Dr. Heilbrunn's report because: (1) it was internally inconsistent; (2) it was inconsistent with the report proffered by Dr. Dale Thuline; (3) it was inconsistent with other evidence in the record; and (4) it was based on Burdon's subjective statements. See id.; see also Batson v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 359 F.3d 1190, 1195 (9th Cir. 2004).
2. The ALJ provided germane reasons for affording lesser weight to the statements given by Burdon's lay witnesses. See Britton v. Colvin, 787 F.3d 1011, 1013 (9th Cir. 2015). Burdon's mother stated that Burdon suffered from “bad headaches” and from back, joint, muscle, and wrist pain. However, as the ALJ pointed out, Burdon's treatment records and reports were inconsistent with her mother's statements. Burdon's friend stated that Burdon's panic attacks lasted for hours, and that she suffered from back and hip pain. However, the ALJ noted Burdon's testimony that her panic attacks lasted only one-half hour at most, and the record reflects no back or hip condition.
AFFIRMED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 13-36133
Decided: May 27, 2016
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)