UNITED STATES v. YEPEZ (2012)

United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. David YEPEZ, Defendant–Appellant.
United States of America, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Audenago Acosta–Montes, Defendant–Appellee.

Nos. 09–50271, 09–50409.

Decided: March 01, 2012

Timothy C. Perry, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff–Appellee. Michael Edmund Burke, Esquire, San Diego, CA, for Defendant–Appellant.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Christen did not participate in the deliberations or vote in these cases.

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law