HUDACKO v. REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (2026)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Edward Allyn HUDACKO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA; Janet Yi Man Lee; Diane Ehrensaft; Stephen Rosenthal; Asaf Orr; Nathaniel Bigger; Daniel Harkins; Christine Underhill, fka Christine Hudacko, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 24-7360

Decided: March 11, 2026

Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Jacqueline H. Nguyen, and Daniel A. Bress, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The panel unanimously voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Nguyen and Bress voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Thomas so recommended. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 40. Judge Tung did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

The petitions for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc (Dkt. No. 91) are DENIED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law