Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
State of OREGON; City of Portland; State of California, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. Donald J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; Peter Hegseth, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense; United States Department of Defense; Kristi Noem, in her official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; United States Department of Homeland Security, Defendants - Appellants.
ORDER
Appeal Nos. 25-6268 and 25-7194 are consolidated.
The court has received the government's emergency motion for stay pending appeal in Appeal No. 25-7194. Docket Entry No. 6. The request for a partial administrative stay is granted. The district court's November 7, 2025, permanent injunction is temporarily stayed to the extent that it enjoins the federalization of the Oregon National Guard pending further order of the court. The court's administrative stay “is only intended to preserve the status quo until the substantive motion for a stay pending appeal can be considered on the merits, and does not constitute in any way a decision as to the merits” of the appeal. See Doe #1 v. Trump, 944 F.3d 1222, 1223 (9th Cir. 2019).
The government is directed to file weekly status reports regarding the current status of any federalized Oregon National Guard, including updates on the defederalization of any troops.
Briefing on the government's emergency motion for stay pending appeal is stayed pending the United States Supreme Court's ruling on the government's application for a stay in Trump v. Illinois, No. 25A443. Once the Supreme Court rules in that matter, this court will promptly set an expedited briefing schedule to allow for consideration of the emergency motion for stay pending appeal. The principal briefing schedules currently in place are vacated and will be reset upon further order of the court.
MURGUIA, Chief Judge:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Nos. 25-6268, 25-7194
Decided: November 19, 2025
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)