CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH v. NEWSOM 50 (2025)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a California Charter City and Municipal Corporation; Huntington Beach City Council; Tony Strickland, Mayor of Huntington Beach; Gracey Van Der Mark, Mayor Pro Tem of Huntington Beach, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. Gavin NEWSOM, individually and in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California; Gustavo Velasquez, in his official capacity as Director of the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development; California Department of Housing and Community Development; Does, 1-50, inclusive; Southern California Association of Government, Defendants – Appellees.

No. 23-3694

Decided: April 21, 2025

Before: Richard C. Tallman, Ryan D. Nelson, and Daniel Bress, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Judge R. Nelson and Judge Bress voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Tallman recommended denying the petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 40.

The petition for rehearing en banc, Dkt. 54, is DENIED.

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law