CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH v. NEWSOM 50 (2025)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a California Charter City and Municipal Corporation; Huntington Beach City Council; Tony Strickland, Mayor of Huntington Beach; Gracey Van Der Mark, Mayor Pro Tem of Huntington Beach, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. Gavin NEWSOM, individually and in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California; Gustavo Velasquez, in his official capacity as Director of the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development; California Department of Housing and Community Development; Does, 1-50, inclusive; Southern California Association of Government, Defendants – Appellees.

No. 23-3694

Decided: April 21, 2025

Before: Richard C. Tallman, Ryan D. Nelson, and Daniel Bress, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Judge R. Nelson and Judge Bress voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Tallman recommended denying the petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 40.

The petition for rehearing en banc, Dkt. 54, is DENIED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network