Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
ARIZONA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS; Voto Latino; Priorities USA, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Kristin K. MAYES, in her official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Arizona, Defendant-Appellant,
Yuma County Republican Committee, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant, and Katie Hobbs, in her official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Arizona; Larry Noble, Nominal Defendant, in his official capacity as Apache County Recorder; David Stevens, Nominal Defendant, in his official capacity as Cochise County Recorder, previously named as David Stephens; Patty Hansen, Nominal Defendant, in her official capacity as Coconino County Recorder; Sadie Jo Bingham, Nominal Defendant, in her official capacity as Gila County Recorder; Wendy John, Nominal Defendant, in her official capacity as Graham County Recorder; Sharie Milheiro, Nominal Defendant, in her official capacity as Greenlee County Recorder; Richard Garcia, Nominal Defendant, in his official capacity as La Paz County Recorder; Stephen Richer, Nominal Defendant, in his official capacity as Maricopa County Recorder; Kristi Blair, Nominal Defendant, in her official capacity as Mohave County Recorder; Michael Sample, Nominal Defendant, in his official capacity as Navajo County Recorder; Gabriella Cazares-Kelly, Nominal Defendant, in her official capacity as Pima County Recorder; Dana Lewis, Nominal Defendant, in her official capacity as Pinal County Recorder; Suzanne Sainz, Nominal Defendant, in her official capacity as Santa Cruz County Recorder; Michelle Burchill, Nominal Defendant, in her official capacity as Yavapai County Recorder; Richard Colwell, Nominal Defendant, in his official capacity as Yuma County Recorder, Defendants.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(c) and Circuit Rule 40-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.
MURGUIA, Chief Judge:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 22-16490
Decided: March 18, 2025
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)