DOE v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC LLC CA LLC (2025)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Jane DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; Rasier, LLC; Rasier CA, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 22-16562

Decided: January 13, 2025

Before: Susan P. Graber, Richard A. Paez, and Michelle T. Friedland, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The majority memorandum disposition filed on August 8, 2024, is hereby amended. The dissent has not been amended. The amended memorandum will be filed and the dissent re-filed concurrently with this order.

With the filing of the amended memorandum, the petition for panel rehearing (Dkt. 87) is DENIED. Judge Graber voted to grant the petition.

A judge of the court requested a vote on en banc rehearing. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc rehearing. Fed. R. App. P. 40(c). Judges Gould, Miller, and VanDyke did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case. Appellees' petition for rehearing en banc (Dkt. 87) is thus DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing shall be filed.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law