HART v. CITY OF REDWOOD CITY (2024)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Kristin HART, individually and as co-successor-in-interest to Decedent Kyle Hart; E.H., individually and as co-successor-in-interest to Decedent Kyle Hart; W.H., individually and as co-successor-in-interest to Decedent Kyle Hart, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, a municipal corporation; Daniel Mulholland, individually and in his capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Redwood City; Roman Gomez, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Redwood City; Leila Velez, individually and in her official capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Redwood City, Defendants-Appellants

No. 22-17008

Decided: October 30, 2024

Before: Eric D. Miller, Bridget S. Bade, and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Judge Miller, Judge Bade, and Judge VanDyke have voted to deny Appellee's petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on en banc rehearing. The majority of the active judges have voted to deny rehearing the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f).

The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law