PHILLIPS v. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION (2024)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Nora PHILLIPS; Erika Pinheiro; Nathaniel Dennison, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION; Mark Morgan; United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement; Matthew Albence; Federal Bureau of Investigation; Christopher Wray, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 21-55768

Decided: May 30, 2024

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Richard C. Tallman, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Plaintiffs-Appellants' petition for panel rehearing, dkt. 58, is DENIED.

Judge Ikuta voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Tallman so recommended. Judge Schroeder recommended granting the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35. Judge H.A. Thomas recused herself and did not participate in the deliberations or vote. Plaintiffs-Appellants' petition for rehearing en banc, dkt. 58, is DENIED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law