PAULETTE SMITH v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES DOES 10 (2024)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

PAULETTE SMITH, individually and as Successor in Interest to Albert Dorsey, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDWARD AGDEPPA, an individual, Defendant-Appellant, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity; DOES, 1 through 10, Defendants.

No. 20-56254

Decided: March 01, 2024

Before: Consuelo M. Callahan, Morgan Christen, and Daniel A. Bress, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Judge Callahan and Judge Bress voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Christen voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35(a). Appellee's petition for rehearing en banc, Dkt. 65, is DENIED.

Order

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law