ARNOLD v. CITY OF ST JOSEPH MISSOURI (2021)

[Unpublished]

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Stacy Arnold appeals after the district court ¹ dismissed some of her claims and adversely granted summary judgment as to her remaining claims. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude the district court properly determined Arnold lacked standing as to her claims for declaratory and injunctive relief, see Buckler v. United States, 919 F.3d 1038, 1044 (8th Cir. 2019) (reviewing de novo grant of motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1)); City of Kennett v. EPA, 887 F.3d 424, 430 (8th Cir. 2018) (reviewing de novo standing determination on summary judgment); and properly granted summary judgment as to her claims for damages, see McReynolds v. Schmidli, 4 F.4th 648, 652 (8th Cir. 2021) (reviewing de novo grant of summary judgment). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

FOOTNOTES

1.   The Honorable Beth Phillips, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

PER CURIAM.