Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Angela Schuncey RICHARDSON Plaintiff - Appellant v. Wendy KELLEY, Chief Director, Arkansas State Prison; Dexter Payne, Assistant Chief of Director, Arkansas State Prison Defendants Tami Aiken, Assistant Warden, McPherson Unit Defendant - Appellee Christopher Johnson, Major, McPherson Unit Defendant Jeannie Long, CO, McPherson Unit Defendant - Appellee Clara Robinson, Program Specialist Coordinator, McPherson Unit; D. Golden, Warden, McPherson Unit Defendants Roger L. Ayers, Sergeant, McPherson Unit; Virginia Spence, Coach, McPherson Unit (originally named as V Spence); John Herrington, Assistant Warden, McPherson Unit Defendants - Appellees
[Unpublished]
Arkansas inmate Angela Schuncey Richardson appeals following the district court's 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action raising equal protection claims related to a prison separation order. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, this court concludes that the district court properly granted summary judgment. See Whitson v. Stone Cnty. Jail, 602 F.3d 920, 923 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review). Richardson's official-capacity claims for damages were barred by sovereign immunity. The evidence was insufficient to show that Richardson was treated differently from similarly situated inmates, or that any unequal treatment was purposeful and motivated by her race or sexual orientation. See Patel v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, 515 F.3d 807, 815 (8th Cir. 2008) (for equal protection claim, prisoner must show that he is treated differently than similarly situated inmates and that the different treatment is based on suspect classification or a fundamental right); Lewis v. Jacks, 486 F.3d 1025, 1028 (8th Cir. 2007) (unequal treatment of persons entitled to be treated alike is not denial of equal protection unless intentional or purposeful discrimination is shown); Weiler v. Purkett, 137 F.3d 1047, 1052 (8th Cir. 1998) (en banc) (few individual examples of unequal treatment are insufficient to more than minimally support inference of purposeful discrimination).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable D.P. Marshall, Jr., Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Patricia S. Harris, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20-3205
Decided: August 24, 2021
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)